Published: July 21, 2026
When a child presents with a first seizure, the temptation is to order tests immediately. But the most powerful diagnostic tool is a carefully obtained history and witness description, according to Siddharth V. Jain, M.D., pediatric epileptologist with Norton Children’s Neuroscience Institute and assistant professor of pediatrics at the University of Louisville School of Medicine.
Testing, Dr. Jain emphasized, should be considered in conjunction with what clinical reasoning has already suggested.
In a recent continuing medical education opportunity, Dr. Jain presented a five-step clinical framework for evaluating new-onset seizures in pediatric patients. The structured approach is designed to guide front-line clinicians from initial presentation through diagnosis, workup and risk stratification.
Before any other consideration, clinicians need to determine whether the event was a seizure at all. Does it meet the description of a transient, stereotyped, network-driven event resulting from abnormal electrical activity in the brain? Three features characterize it:
Network-driven – the sequence of symptoms mirrors well-defined brain networks, which is why seizures can present so differently depending on where they originate
These three features are not just academic distinctions — they are the practical lens through which witness descriptions become diagnostic data.
This distinction must be made early and clearly communicated to families, according to Dr. Jain. A seizure is a single event — an isolated episode of abnormal electrical activity. Epilepsy is the underlying disease: a brain disorder characterized by an enduring predisposition to generate epileptic seizures.
Clinically, epilepsy is diagnosed when any of the following criteria are met:
This shapes the urgency of workup, the conversation with families and the decision about whether to initiate treatment.
Careful observation of what happens during a seizure — its semiology — provides critical localizing information before any test has been ordered. Video EEG is the gold standard, but in the clinic, a well-obtained witness description is the first diagnostic tool.
When taking the history, Dr. Jain recommends starting with open-ended questions (“Tell me what you saw.”), then becoming specific: What was the first thing that happened? Which body part moved first? Was the patient aware and responsive? How long did it last? What happened after it ended?
Seizure semiology maps to cortical anatomy. Here is a practical summary of what each region of onset looks like:
When a patient presents after a first unprovoked seizure, the detailed history is not preliminary to the workup — it is the workup. The history guides every subsequent decision: what tests to order, whether to admit and how to stratify recurrence risk.
Key elements to document: event description (stereotypy, duration, progression), level of awareness, postictal phase, relevant history (prior febrile seizures, family history of epilepsy, neurodevelopmental conditions) and any precipitating factors.
A routine EEG is appropriate in most children with a reasonable clinical concern for seizures or epilepsy. Beyond simply confirming or ruling out a seizure, EEG can:
A few important caveats for primary care:
MRI is not needed for every first seizure. It is indicated when there is concern for a structural or focal cause, including:
The following warrant urgent or emergency evaluation — they may signal an acute neurological condition such as infection, stroke or injury rather than primary epilepsy:
Not every first seizure requires admission. A child who has returned to baseline, has no focal deficits, no red flags and a clear first unprovoked seizure in the context of normal development often can be managed as an outpatient with close follow-up and expedited EEG. Admission is appropriate when the diagnosis is unclear, red flags are present, or PNES is suspected and inpatient video EEG monitoring is needed to capture an event.
EEG must never be interpreted in isolation. A positive finding alone is not sufficient for diagnosis, and a normal EEG does not rule out epilepsy. The EEG has to be read alongside the clinical picture.
Key considerations:
The final step pulls together everything from the preceding four to answer the question families ask most: How likely is this to happen again?
Recurrence risk is shaped by:
A single seizure with clear syndrome features (e.g., 3-hertz spike-wave on EEG after a staring spell) can establish an epilepsy diagnosis right away.
Syndrome identification, when possible, is the most actionable step. According to Dr. Jain, a patient with childhood absence epilepsy has a fundamentally different trajectory than a child with Dravet syndrome — even though both may present with generalized seizures.
Getting to a syndrome diagnosis:
When a syndrome diagnosis cannot be made, treatment follows general principles based on seizure type (focal versus generalized). Further clinical evaluation and repeat testing may clarify the picture over time.